Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:17

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
The Law Firms That Appeased Trump—and Angered Their Clients - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Is it possible to revive a dead person in real life with black magic?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Is 1500 calories enough for a 5’3 15-year-old who is non-active?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Fervo Energy lands $206M in financing to build massive geothermal power plant - TechCrunch
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
It seems that I am cursed with bad luck. How do I break such a curse?